2004 (8) TMI 522
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... A.R. Saxena, JDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : S.S. Sekhon, Member (T)]. - Appellants are a firm who imported duty free, medical equipments in the year 1988-90 and its Doctor proprietor. Imports were made after having applied for and obtaining a certificate from the Director General Health Services, after due verifications, of a Customs Duty Exemption under Notification 64/88. 2.&ems....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... duty, in respect of which the condition is not observed unless the non-observance of the condition was sanctioned by the proper officer" What would be liable to confiscation. In the present case, a Customs Duty Exemption certificate was issued by Director-General Health Services of India after he got the appellants premises and project verified. There was no misdeclaration or misleading inform....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....has laid down, that Diagnostic Centre without indoor facility would be eligible to the benefit of notification. Appeal of Revenue in Gujarat Imaging & Research Institute has been dismissed by the Supreme Court, 1998 (103) E.L.T. A113 (S.C.). Department has accepted the decision in case of Surlux and in case of Gautam Diagnostic [2001 (133) E.L.T. 812] benefit has been granted. No reason is therefo....
TaxTMI