Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2004 (6) TMI 490

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Shri A. Jayachandran, JDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : P.G. Chacko, Member (J)]. -  The demand of over Rs. 1,00,000/- confirmed by the lower appellate authority against the appellants is on tyres and tubes which were removed for testing within their factory premises during August 1969 to May 1997. The original authority had vacated this demand. The department preferred an appe....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... for marketing and passed by the Technical hand." Ld. Counsel submits that, in the instant case, the tyres were destroyed in testing and hence did not qualify for accountal in RG-1. The Counsel has also relied, on the Tribunal's decision rendered in the case of Neelkamal Plastics Ltd. v Commissioner of Central Excise, Noida reported in 2004 (164) E.L.T. 197 (Tri.-Del.), wherein it was held that no....