Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2004 (6) TMI 473

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....SDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : S.L. Peeran, Member (J) (Oral)]. - The appellant is seeking the stay of the operation of the Commissioner (Appeals)'s order No. 29/2004, dated 27-2-2004 by which he has allowed the departmental appeal filed before him by the Assistant Commissioner of Customs and remanded the matter for de novo consideration. The short question raised by the appellant is ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... 2. Heard both sides in the matter. 3. On a careful consideration, prima facie, we are satisfied that in terms of the provision of Section 129D(2), the authority who passed the order should be directed to file the appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals). While in the present case, the Commissioner of Customs has authorised the Assistant Commissioner to file the appeal who was not ....