Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2004 (5) TMI 475

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....he Appellant. Shri H.C. Verma, JDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : V.K. Agrawal, Member (T)]. -  These are 2 applications for waiver of pre-deposit of following amounts of duty :- (1) M/s. Flex Inds. Ltd. Rs. 11,44,152/- (2) M/s. FCL Technologies & Products Ltd. Rs. 28,86,224/- 2. Shri K.K. Anand, learned Advocate, submitted that the demands have been confirmed ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....2001 that coercive step for realization of the amount from the petitioner not be taken till further orders; that in view of this they may not be directed to make any pre-deposit under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act. He also submitted the Supreme Court in the case of C.C.E., Hyderabad v. Associated Cement Co. Ltd. - 2003 (151) E.L.T. 12 (S.C.) has held that the assessee is entitled to get th....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....l; that the Hon'ble Madhya Pradesh High Court had only ordered the respondent in writ petition not to take any coersive measure for realizing the due; that any amount directed to be pre-deposited under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act is not a coercive measure. He finally mentioned that the decision in Associated Cement Co. Ltd. has been pronounced on the basis of old Rule 57B without bringin....