2004 (6) TMI 461

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....pellant. Shri C. Mani, JDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : P.G. Chacko, Member (J) (Oral)]. - These applications, filed by the appellants, pray for restoration of the respective appeals which were dismissed under Rule 11 of the CEGAT (Procedure) Rules as per Final Order Nos. 1072-1073/2003, dated 16-12-2003. The said final order noted that the appellants had refused to accept the hearin....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....t all it had happened so, it could have been due to oversight. We have heard the DR also. 3. The Counsel for the appellants submitted that, if any hearing notice was refused to be received, it might have happened so for want of any responsible person in the office of the company. Even though, these submissions are not very impressive, we take note of one statement of Shri Rajendra Pathak, ....