Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2004 (1) TMI 546

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....: S.S. Kang, Member (J)]. -  When the case was called, none appeared on behalf of the respondents in spite of notice. Notice issued to the respondents was received back with the postal remarks "factory closed". Therefore, the appeal is taken up in the absence of the respondents. 2. Heard learned SDR. 3. The respondents are engaged in the manufacture of M. S. ingots and annual cap....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ce. 6. We find that against the demand which is based on the capacity as determined by the Commissioner of Central Excise, the Commissioner of Central Excise also considered the abatement claims filed by the respondents and the same were allowed on merits. Revenue is not challenging in the present appeal that abatement claims were wrongly allowed. Therefore, while confirming demand, adjustme....