Just a moment...

Report
ReportReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Report an Error
Type of Error :
Please tell us about the error :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

2004 (1) TMI 546

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....: S.S. Kang, Member (J)]. -  When the case was called, none appeared on behalf of the respondents in spite of notice. Notice issued to the respondents was received back with the postal remarks "factory closed". Therefore, the appeal is taken up in the absence of the respondents. 2. Heard learned SDR. 3. The respondents are engaged in the manufacture of M. S. ingots and annual cap....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ce. 6. We find that against the demand which is based on the capacity as determined by the Commissioner of Central Excise, the Commissioner of Central Excise also considered the abatement claims filed by the respondents and the same were allowed on merits. Revenue is not challenging in the present appeal that abatement claims were wrongly allowed. Therefore, while confirming demand, adjustme....