Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2004 (7) TMI 479

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....  When the case was called none appeared on behalf of the respondent in spite of notice. The case was adjourned twice for arguments and the respondents were unrepresented. 2. Heard ld. DR. Revenue filed this appeal against the Order-in-Appeal passed by the Commissioner (Appeals) whereby the Commissioner (Appeals) set aside the confiscation and penalty in respect of the goods found in e....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....hysical verification was conducted in the presence of Shri Suresh Kumar Agarwal, Director who signed the Panchnama by accepting the same as correct where the excess of 4.326 M.T. of M.S. Bars found. 6. I find that the verification of stock was conducted in the presence of Shri Suresh Kumar Agarwal, Director of the Unit and he accepted the correctness of the verification where he admitted the....