2004 (5) TMI 361

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....r : Jyoti Balasundaram, Member (J)]. -  The authorities below have rejected the appellants claim for refund of duty of Rs. 1,58,665/- paid on tyres, tubes and flaps falling under Chapter 40 of the Schedule to CETA, 1985 during the period from June to September, 1992, on the ground that the bar of unjust enrichment operates against them as they have passed on the duty burden to their customer....