Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Feedback/Report an Error
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

2004 (3) TMI 562

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ri Rajesh Chander Kumar pleaded that in this case the only issue under dispute is imposition of penalty under Section 11AC on the appellants. He stated that the appellants were clearing their goods on stock transfer basis to their depots on payment of appropriate central excise duty. As and when there was an increase/revision in the price, the appellants used to file revised declaration. The Head Office of the appellant at Chennai were collating the data from various depots and prepare a statement showing the enhanced price at which the goods were sold from the depots. On the basis of such statements, they were remitting the differential duty voluntarily. With effect from 1-4-99, SAP was introduced by the Company in the factory and depots a....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....t under Section 11AB of the said Act. On appeal, the Commissioner (Appeals) reduced the penalty to Rs. 4,78,061/- and upheld the rest of the Order of the Additional Commissioner. He pleaded that when the appellants had paid the differential duty voluntarily, penalty and interest under Sections 11AC and 11AB is not leviable, in view of the Tribunal's decision in the following cases : (a)        Eicher Demm v. CCE, Chandigarh [2002 (140) E.L.T. 227 (Tri. - Del.)] (b)        EID Parry (I) Ltd. v. CCE, Jaipur [2003 (157) E.L.T. 193 (Tri. -Chennai)] (c)        Ashok Leyland Ltd. v. CCE, Chennai [2003 (156) E.L.T. 995 (Tri. -Chennai)] He a....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... this case the appellants had not paid the differential duty of Rs. 8,48,820/- for the period from 1-4-99 to 3/2001 on the ground that there was snag in the computer after introduction of SAP system. However, they have voluntarily paid the duty of Rs. 3,70,759/-. The balance amount was also paid when it was pointed out by the Central Excise audit. Thus, they have voluntarily paid the duty and therefore penalty under Section 11AC is not imposable. I find that voluntary payment of duty is that payment which is detected by the assessee himself and then he pays the duty without being pointed out by the Revenue. Such payment can only be considered as voluntary payment for non-imposition of penalty under Section 11AC. The decision relied upon by ....