Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2003 (9) TMI 632

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e contract, they placed orders for fabrication of 6 sets of bridge builder systems (hereinafter referred to as BBS) on the basis of technical know-how and drawings of a Narway Government through their representatives M/s. United Trading Corporation, Madras and M/s. S.K. Trading Company, Bombay. On the basis of an intelligence that BBS used by M/s. UPSBC were manufactured and cleared without discharging Central Excise Duty therein and consequent to the investigations conducted by the Department show cause notices were issued to M/s. S.K. Trading and M/s. UPSBC for the manufacture and clearance of six sets and two sets respectively of BBS without obtaining Central Excise Registration and without following the procedures prescribed and dischar....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ntering arrangement in knocked down condition. Therefore, the duty as proposed in the show cause notice amounting to Rs. 8,71,918/- was required to be confirmed under the provisions of Rule 9(2) read with to Section 11A(1). (b) As regards the show cause notice issued to M/s. S.K. Trading the learned Commissioner, after recording that they had not submitted any written reply to the show cause notice and considering their reply in the hearing found, that they were sub-contractors for M/s. UPSBC Ltd., and had been supplying raw material and drawing and fabricated BBS according to the same. This was not acceptable to the Commissioner as M/s. S.K. Trading had agreed to the fact that they were engaged in the fabrication of the BBS and inf....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....r the provisions of Rules 209A, 226, 173, 210, 52A, a penalty of Rs. 1 lakh was imposed on Shri Prabhuvala partner of M/s. S.K. Trading and Rs. 25,000/- was imposed on M/s. United Marketing under Rule 209A. No orders were passed as regards the proposal to confiscate land, building, machinery, etc. The present appeals have been filed against the above said order and are being disposed of by this common order. 3. After hearing both sides, and considering the issues it is found - (a) The show cause notice dated 29-12-1995 in para 10 (XI) alleges - "The said six sets of BBS manufactured and cleared by M/s. S.K. Trading Company and two sets of BBS manufactured and cleared by M/s. UPSBC are moulding patterns which are used for ....