Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Search

We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Search

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2003 (10) TMI 503

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....sp;This is an appeal filed by M/s. Ghataprabha Sahakari Sakkare Karkhane Niyamit against the Order-in-Appeal No. 78/2002-C.E., dated 14-2-2002 passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals), Bangalore. 2. When the case was called, nobody appeared for the appellants nor intimation for adjournment was received. Earlier, this appeal was posted for hearing and was adjourned on the reques....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....um on the ground of unjust enrichment. On appeal, the Commissioner (Appeals) in his Order-in-Appeal has held that 'if the appellants produce the proof of destruction of molasses, the excess duty paid to the extent of Rs. 78,681/- should be refunded'. The appellant had claimed before the Commissioner (Appeals) that the duty paid molasses was destroyed in presence of the State Government Excise offi....