Just a moment...

Report
ReportReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Report an Error
Type of Error :
Please tell us about the error :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

2003 (11) TMI 447

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nt. [Order]. -  The appellants are manufacturers of sugar and molasses. The Department has demanded and confirmed the duty on 7,000 qtls. of molasses for the year 1995-96 stored in approved steel tank No. 2, but which accidentally leaked therefrom and seeped into an adjoining kachcha pit. The high grade molasses quantity that leaked in the kachcha pit got inter-mixed with the low grade mola....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... duty of Rs. 56,000/-. The appellant's appeal was rejected by the Commissioner (Appeals), Central Excise, Allahabad. Hence the appeal before the Tribunal. 2. Heard both sides. 3. The aforementioned facts are not in dispute. It is true that, 7,000 qtls. molasses stored in steel tanks (approved premises) did leak out and were diverted to kachcha pits. Due to mixing with sub-standard mola....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... the steel tank. It is also an admitted fact that, the steel tank has been approved by the department for storage of molasses after ensuring that these were safe for storage of molasses. Merely alleging that, the party failed to provide safe and secure storage for molasses and took no pains to prevent leakage, without mentioning as to where the failure was, does not support the case for denying th....