Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Search

We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Search

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2003 (9) TMI 622

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ondent. [Order]. - M/s. Delhi Dyeing Mills have filed this Appeal against Order-in-Appeal No. 560/2002 passed by the Commissioner (Appeals) confirming redemption fine and penalty against them. Shri C. Hari Shankar, learned Advocate, submitted that the Appellants are engaged in processing of fabrics; that the Central Excise Preventive officers visited their factory premises on 6-9-99 and found 1....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....lot-wise register which were produced also before the Central Excise officer; that however, the officer did not verify the said register. He, further, submitted that it is well settled that non-accountal of finished goods in the RG-I register does not ipso facto render them liable for confiscation. He relied upon the decision in the case of Lakshmi Polypacks Pvt. Ltd. v. CCE, Hyderabad-I, 2003 (56....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ation under the provisions of Rule 173Q of the Central Excise Rules. He relied upon the decision of the Tribunal in the case of Media Video Ltd. v. CCE, New Delhi [2003 (160) E.L.T. 609 (T) = 2003 (55) RLT 407]. He also relied upon the decision in the case of Kirloskar Brothers v. Union of India, [1988 (34) E.L.T. 30 (Bombay)] wherein the Bombay High Court has held that for imposition of penalty a....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....er for further action. The Appellants have neither challenged the Panchnama nor brought any evidence on record to show that the statements given by their partner Shri Rakesh Kalra was retracted. They have also not brought any material in support of their contention that the fabrics was not fully processed and was under the process of finishing. In view of this, there is no force in the submissions....