Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2003 (5) TMI 454

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

...., for the Respondent. [Order per : Gowri Shankar, Member (T)]. -  The appellant imported on 28-7-1992, a consignment of urethane elastomer (CA-128) claiming the benefit of the exemption contained in notification 172/92. The goods were cleared by granting the benefit of the exemption. Notice was issued to the importer on 5-1-1993, followed by a corrigendum dated 11-2-1993. The notice alleged....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e as provided by law, in the light of the instructions issued by the Board and communicated to the trade by means of trade notice. Therefore, the notice issued by the Assistant Collector of Customs, is without jurisdiction. He cites the judgment of the Supreme Court in CCE v. Oil & Natural Gas Commission - 1998 (103) E.L.T. 3 followed by its subsequent judgment in CCE v. Frick India Ltd. (in Civil....