Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2003 (8) TMI 389

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....rder]. -  As the issue involved in this appeal filed by M/s. U.P. State Sugar Corporation Limited is in a narrow compass, I stay the recovery of the entire amount of penalty imposed on them and take up the appeal itself for disposal. 2. Shri Bipin Garg, learned Advocate, submitted that the Appellants had received two consignments of the capital goods on 10-11-1997 and 18-12-1997; that ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ing the application for condonation of delay and as such the penalty is imposable on them for wrongly availing the Modvat credit. 4. I have considered the submissions of both the sides.  The facts which are not in dispute are that the capital goods in question were received by the Appellants in November, 1997 and December, 1997, the declaration under Rule 57T was filed in January, 1998 ....