Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Feedback/Report an Error
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

1999 (1) TMI 499

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....er : A.C.C. Unni, Member (J)]. - This appeal is against the Order-in-Original dated 27-2-1997 passed by the Commissioner of Customs, New Delhi confirming a duty demand of Rs. 3,21,944/- against the appellants as well as a fine in lieu of confiscation amounting to Rs. 2,50,000/- and a penalty of Rs. 60,000/- imposed on the present appellants. 2. We have heard Shri G. Shiv Das, Advocate for ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....appellants. Commissioner of Customs had, by the impugned order, confirmed the demand and confiscated the consignment with option for redemption and imposed a penalty referred to above. 4. Learned Counsel submitted that the importers (appellants) had only followed the established practice of Customs Houses all over the country of indicating the value towards Diskettes at 60% of the total valu....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... The Commissioner had also accepted the position that the value declared by the importers was on the basis of best judgment assessment by splitting up the ratio of 60 : 40. It was only as a sequel to a decision taken at the conference of Collector in April, 1991 that it was decided to classify the software along with the Manual under Heading 85.24. Learned Counsel submitted that there was also no....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....aram reiterated the findings of the Commissioner in the impugned order and referred to the correspondence exchanged between the Manager of the appellants and the foreign supplier to show that the appellants had requested the foreign supplier to split up the value of software and manuals. The Commissioner had, therefore, held that the splitting up of the value of software and manuals was a clear at....