Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI OCR

Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2003 (3) TMI 523

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ut. Clearance of goods without debiting duty in the PLA, shortage of input, namely, Lead Oxide etc. were noted during verification. Subsequently, a show-cause notice was issued. This notice was adjudicated by the Deputy Commissioner imposing a penalty of Rs. 10,000/- on the appellant. Dissatisfied with this order, Revenue filed an appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals). The grievance made out in the appeal was with regard to availing of Modvat Credit on inputs. While the Commissioner rejected the contentions on other grounds, he held that there was a shortage of 16.225 MTs, of Lead Oxide. Accordingly, it was ordered that the appellant should pay duty on the quantity found short. The relevant portion of the finding is reproduced below :- ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....garding the quantity of 8.07 MTs of the inputs contained in the quantity of finished goods manufactured on 8-12-94 is not correct since this quantity was already taken into account by including the quantity of the inputs under process on 8-12-94. The quantity of inputs contained in the processed material is different and the quantity of inputs contained in the finished goods is different and, therefore, the two quantities cannot be equated and the appellant's subsequent explanation in this regard is acceptable. Further, since the receipt of 5 MTS of the inputs has also been proved as accounted for and used in the manufacture of the finished goods, the same should also be taken into consideration for the computation of the shortages. Thus, i....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....p;                    Total 73.825 M.T.   Lead Oxide consumed from 3-12-1994 To 6-12-1994 15.350 M.T. Lead Oxide in the process material on 8-12-1994 8.550 M.T. Lead Oxide in the already finished goods On 8-12-1994 (taken in RGI in 9-12-1994) 8.075 M.T. Lead Oxide available on floor 25.625 M.T. __________                      Total 57.600 M.T.       73.825 M.T.                        (-) ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... to the rooms of the security staff for temporary storage. The appellants stressed that they had produced evidence about the repair of the floor before the Deputy Commissioner and the Dy. Commissioner had accepted their explanation. About the delay in explaining the shortage, it has been stated that the Factory Manager had informed the Officers on 8-12-1994 that he will make verifications and give a statement in a week's time. However, no statement was recorded from him and only show cause notice was issued. 4. The learned D.R. has contented that the appellant's explanation regarding repair of the floor is too belated and the Commissioner was, therefore, justified in rejecting the explanation and demanding duty. 5. The core of t....