Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2003 (5) TMI 255

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....en demanded from Aafloat Textiles on quantities of goods imported by it and cleared in terms of special imprest licences, which rendered the goods eligible for partial exemption from duty as contained in Notification No. 117/94. The basis of the charge that the licences were forged is not denied by any of the applicants. The claim on behalf of the importer and, S.N. Baheti & Prakash K. Mehta, its Chairman and Managing Director respectively, on each of whom penalty of Rs. 25,000/- under Section 112 is imposed, is that they purchased these licences in the ordinary course of business from Ketan Shah and Mahendra Shah and did not have reason to believe that they are forged. It is emphasized that no evidence has been sought to show complicity of....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....en into account. We therefore think it appropriate to ask each of these applicants to deposit Rs. 5 lakhs. 5. Mahendra Shah and Kamlesh Mehta, on each of whom penalties of Rs. 50 lakhs and Rs. 25 lakhs respectively have been imposed, were the brokers who supplied licences to the importer. The notice alleges that Mahendra Shah is in fact the main person concerned, having created four firms in the name of Kamlesh Mehta, his employee, in order to transact in forged licences. Heavy emphasis is placed in the order upon the fact that Mahendra Shah, in his statements recorded under Section 108 of the Act, accepted that he was aware of the licences that he purchased from Pradeep Saraogi, Mahendra Kothari and Atul Goradia were forged and tha....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....cial participation by him in the venture. The contention of financial hardship that he has no income other than that from retail sale of plastic articles for the past three years is not rebutted by the Departmental Representative. Therefore, we waive deposit of the penalty imposed on him and stay its recovery. 8. The contentions on behalf of Atul Goradia, broker, who sold the licences to Mahendra Shah and Kamlesh Mehta are essentially the admission of knowledge contained in the statement and should not be relied upon as it is retracted. Here again, there is an interval of a number of days according to his statements and their retraction, for which no explanation was given. There is no evidence whatsoever in support of financial hard....