Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2002 (12) TMI 340

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....SDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : C.N.B. Nair, Member (T)]. -  This appeal is directed against the Order-in-Original No. 7/MP/97, dated 30-1-97 passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise and Customs, Surat. Under the impugned order the Commissioner held that the Grinding Media Steel Balls manufactured by the appellants were classifiable under Tariff Item 8482 as against the origin....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....issioner has relied on the report of the Chemist which stated that the samples of the Grinding Media Balls in question conformed to the norm stipulated in the aforesaid Note 6 to Chapter 84. Para 22 of the impugned order reads :- "22. Report of the Chemical test of samples of the disputed product given by the Chief Chemist, C.R.C.L., New Delhi, reads as under :- "Each of the 10 samples ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e also contended that whether the balls are polished or not is not relevant. 5. We find that this Tribunal has already held that Polished Steel Balls conforming to the norms stated in Note 6 of Chapter 84 would be classifiable under Chapter 84.82 [Pratap Engineering Works v. CCE, Jaipur, 1995 (78) E.L.T. 472]. 6. The test report of the Chemical Examiner has held that the goods manu....