Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2002 (7) TMI 574

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ainable. Before considering the reasoning of the Learned Company Judge, we will extract section 543(1) of the Companies Act below :- "543. Power of Court to assess damages against delinquent directors, etc.-(1) If in the course of winding up a company, it appears that any person who has taken part in the promotion or formation of the company, or any past or present director, manager, liquidator or officer of the company- (a )has misapplied, or retained, or become liable or accountable for, any money or property of the company; or (b)has been guilty of any misfeasance or breach of trust in relation to the company; the Court may, on the application of the Official Liquidator, of the liquidator, or of any creditor or contributory, made within the time specified in that behalf in sub-section (2), examine into the conduct of the person, director, manager, liquidator or officer aforesaid, and compel him to repay or restore the money or property or any part thereof, respectively, with interest at such rate as the Court thinks just or to contribute such sum to the assets of the company by way of compensation in respect of the misapplication, retainer, misfeasance or breach of trust, as....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....r' should be differentially treated than the 'liquidator'. With regard to the contention that even if 'official liquidator' is not specifically included in the first and last parts of definition, he will come in the category of officer, the learned Judge found that the liquidator, officer etc. are specifically mentioned in the section and therefore under the term 'officer' official liquidator will not come especially considering the inclusive definition of officer under section 2(30) of the Companies Act. 3. We may now consider how the official liquidator is appointed. Section 448 of the Companies Act provides how the official liquidator is appointed. Section 448(1)(a) reads as follows : "448. Appointment of Official Liquidator.-(1) For the purposes of this Act, so far as it relates to the winding up of companies by the Court,- (a )there shall be attached to each High Court, an Official Liquidator appointed by the Central Government, who shall be whole-time officer, unless the Central Government considers that there will not be sufficient work for a whole-time officer in which case a part-time officer may be appointed;" Section 449 provides that on a winding up order being made....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ection 543(1), the term 'liquidator' contemplates a 'liquidator' of a particular company which is in the process of winding up. It can be an official liquidator appointed as liquidator in a court winding up or a liquidator in voluntary winding up. But the second part uses the terms 'official liquidator' and 'liquidator' separately because an official liquidator apart from his capacity as 'liquidator' of a company under winding up by court, can file a petition under the above section in his official capacity. It enables the official liquidator to file a complaint against the liquidator of a company in voluntary winding up or any other officer as mentioned in the section. In other words, even if that company is under voluntary winding up and he is not appointed as a liquidator to that company, official liquidator can file a petition. That is why in the second part of the definition official liquidator is specifically mentioned. In the first part and the last part, the term 'liquidator' is mentioned as a liquidator of a particular company in winding up and as regards a company ordered to be wound up as per the orders of the court, 'the official liquidator' is necessarily 'the liquidat....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

...., 539, 543, 545, 621, 625 and 633 does not include an auditor;" The above section is only an inclusive definition. Certain officers are specifically mentioned as officers of the company. In P.C. Pothen, Liquidator of the Common Wealth Bank Ltd. (in liquidation) (1966) (1) I.L.R. Ker. 1 Justice Raman Nayar has very clearly considered the matter in paragraphs 3 and 4 of the above decision. Since the matter cannot be explained in a more clear language, we extract below the paragraphs 3 and 4 : "3. The Registrar has taken the objection that a liquidator is not an officer of the company that is being wound up, and that therefore section 633 can have no application to him. My attention is drawn to the definition of 'officer' in section 2(30) of the Act, and it is pointed out that a liquidator finds no mention there. But then the definition is an inclusive definition, so that, if according to the ordinary meaning of the term a liquidator can be regarded as an officer of the company, the definition cannot have the effect of excluding him. My attention is next drawn to sections 192(7), 485(2) and 501(2) of the Act which expressly provide that for certain purposes a liquidator shall be dee....