Just a moment...

Report
ReportReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Report an Error
Type of Error :
Please tell us about the error :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

2002 (4) TMI 751

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....der]. - The appellants manufacture white cement falling under Chapter Heading No. 25.02. They availed the Modvat credit of Rs. 1,39,239/- in the month of March, 1994 on the furnace oil received by them from Indian Oil Corporation, Kandla. The Central Excise Authorities observed that these goods were not received under the cover of Central Excise Gate Pass (GP-1) which was the valid duty paying d....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....s further imposed a penalty of Rs. 50,000/- on them under Rule 173Q(1)(bb) of Central Excise Rules, 1944. 2. The party filed an appeal but the same was rejected by the Commissioner (Appeals), Jaipur, vide his order dated 23-11-2001. The Commissioner (Appeals) in his order has observed that the Modvat credit involved in the present case was earlier rejected by the Assistant Commissioner vide ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....hri H.C. Verma, JDR for the respondents. The ld. Counsel for the appellants submits that the Modvat credit is admissible to the appellants on the strength of the challan/certificate issued by M/s. IOC as provided at serial No. 7 of the Table annexed to Notification No. 16/94-C.E. (N.T.), dated 30-3-94 issued under Rule 57G of Central Excise Rules, 1944. It is not disputed by the appellants that ea....