1999 (1) TMI 483

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... for the Appellant. Shri K.L. Ramteke, JDR, for the Respondent. [Order]. -  This is an appeal filed by the appellants against the decision of the Collector of Central Excise (Appeals), Mumbai made in Order-in-Appeal No. GS/1028/B-I/93 received by the assessee on 6-10-1993 whereunder the Collector (Appeals) have denied Modvat credit on the inputs on the basis of documents issued two y....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....removal of inputs under Rule 57F(2). Shri Mehta emphasises the fact that this is a case where Rule 57-I is not at all applicable. Therefore, reference to Rule 57F(2) is absolutely wrong as the facts do not warrant the same. He further emphasises the fact that show cause notice is too criptic and vague in as much as it does not show the basis on which the Superintendent comes to the prima facie con....