Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

1994 (1) TMI 210

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... ORDER 1. In this petition, under section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure the petitioners challenge the Criminal Complaint No. 47 of 1991, pending against them, before the Special Court of Judicial Magistrate (Economic Offences), Rajasthan, Jaipur, for the offence under section 220 of the Companies Act, 1956 ('the Companies Act'). At the relevant time, all the four petitioners are said....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... by section 162 for a default in complying with the provisions of section 159, 160 or 161." A bare perusal of the aforesaid provision makes it clear that for non-compliance of the requirements of sub-sections (1) and (2) of section 220, the company and every officer of the company, who is in default, is liable to the punishment. Section 5 of the Act defines officer who is in default and it prov....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... in this behalf to the Board. (g)in case any company does not have any of the officers specified in clauses (a) to (c), any director or directors who may be specified by the Board in this behalf or where no director is so specified, all the directors : Provided that where the Board exercises any powers under clause (f) or clause (g ), it shall, within thirty days of the exercise of such powe....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... 3. In the above situation, when the averments made in the complaint, if taken on their face value, do not make out a case against the petitioners, it would not (sic) be in the interest of justice to quash the complaint to prevent abuse of the process of the Court [see R.P. Kapoor v. State of Punjab AIR 1960 SC 866 and Madhu Limaye v. State of Maharashtra] AIR 1978 SC 47. 4. The result of th....