Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2001 (6) TMI 653

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

...., for the Respondent. [Order per : Gowri Shankar, Member (T)]. -  This appeal is against the order of the Commissioner of Customs, Ahmedabad ordering confiscation of the 109 mobile telephones and some other goods which the appellant sought to smuggle through the Customs in Ahmedabad, valuing Rs. 10,52,800/-, ordering their confiscation under Clauses (d) and (l) of Section 111 of the Act....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ore it landed that he had these telephones. This was not a document that was relied upon in the notice but we cite this as evidence of the state of mind of the appellant. 3. It is next contended that the value of these telephones should be Rs. 6.71 lakhs, based on the invoice dated 14-5-1999 issued by IIford Cellular, 310 Green Lane, IIford, Essex, UK. This invoice had no number, nor it is....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....y, of what that employee told him. Such an attempt to actively support the employee's case leads us to conclude that the relationship between the appellant and Marshall goes beyond that of employee and employer; Marshall evidently has a closer relationship with the appellant. The invoice issued by Marshall (if he issued it) is, therefore, not a document issued in the ordinary course of business, a....