1989 (8) TMI 275

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....he Applicant. Udaya Holla for the Respondent. JUDGMENT M.P. Chandrakantharaj Urs, J. - This application is made in Company Petition No. 68 of 1987 seeking an order of this court directing the respondent-company whose winding up is sought in the company petition to hand over possession of the premises which belongs to the applicant as the landlord in that the premises shall be in the custo....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... the Act, this court does not derive any power from any other source to give incidental relief which will have the effect of nullifying the provisions contained in section 22 of the Act. In other words, what is prohibited to be done directly by this court cannot be done indirectly. Learned counsel for the applicant, however, contended that section 443 of the Companies Act empowers the court to ....