1984 (12) TMI 223

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....r the Respondent. JUDGMENT Mittal, J. - Briefly, the facts are that the petitioner was a limited company and was engaged in the business of manufacturing and sale of packed and canned food at Rai district, Sonepat. It was ordered to be woundup, vide order dated August 21, 1980, in C.P. No. 234 of 1977 presented on November 7, 1977. It is alleged that the petitioner-company was supplying good....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....dents. Today it was found that prima facie the petition was barred by limitation. Consequently, I framed the following preliminary issue: Whether the petition is within limitation? According to the allegations in the petition, an amount of Rs. 1,307.96 was due from respondent No. 1 on October 21, 1976. The limitation under the Limitation Act, 1963, for recovery of such amounts is three ye....