2001 (5) TMI 701

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....or the Appellant. Shri S. Arumugam, D.R., for the Respondents. [Order per : S.L. Peeran, Member (J)]. -  This is an application for condonation of delay by which the applicant is seeking condonation of 248 days from the date of the order. The appellant is a limited company. The reason given by the appellant company is that the company is managed by its Managing Director Shri V. Sashi....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....gineering Works v. M/s. Srivatsa Tube Corporation [AIR 1989 (Mad.) 237-239 pp 238 and 239]. Counsel submits that the appellant will not gain anything by delaying in filing the appeal. He contends that he was also approaching the Commissioner for clarification in the matter. He has already paid the Redemption fine and penalty and he has got a very good case on merit and if the delay is not condoned....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....d the long delay of 248 days. The Managing Director's Aunt's heart ailment could not come in the way of appellants from carrying out their other business activities. He was also approaching the Commissioner in the matter. Nothing prevented the appellants from filing the appeal as he did not require much time or energy. The appellant has also not given any other convincing, satisfactory and suffici....