Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1999 (5) TMI 420

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... None, for the Respondent. [Order per : V.K. Agrawal, Member (T)]. -  The issue involved in all these cases is whether the duty of Central Excise can be demanded at the tariff rate from an unit Registered as S.S.I. when they cleared the goods on payment of duty at the concessional rate without availing the benefit of Modvat credit under Rule 57A of the Central Excise Rules. 2. S....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... the Respondents availed higher notional credit under Rule 57B of the Central Excise Rules, as it stood at the relevant time. Therefore, demands were issued to the Respondents for payment of duty at full rate. The Assistant Collector confirmed duty demand issued under five show cause notices and imposed penalty of Rs. 5,000/- holding that as the Respondents were not availing of Modvat Credit facil....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....the goods without payment of duty. They have relied upon the following decisions : 1. Specialised Components P. Ltd. v. C.C.E. - 1999 (106) E.L.T. 326 2. Jai Industries v. C.C.E. - 1993 (68) E.L.T. 475 3. Amar Machine Tools (P) Ltd. v. C.C.E. - 1995 (80) E.L.T. 595 It has not been disputed by the Revenue that the Respondents were eligible for the benefit of Notification ....