2001 (7) TMI 611

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nt. [Order]. - The appellants are engaged in the manufacture of printing ink falling under sub-heading No. 3215.00 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. The appellants manufactured and consumed 20 Kgs. of printing ink for manufacture of 20 Kgs. catalytic agent falling under sub-heading No. 3815.00, during the month of March, 1996 without disclosing the factum of captive consumption in the dec....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....l Excise confirming demand of duty against them and also imposing personal penalty of Rs. 1,000/-. Appeal against the same failed. 4. I have heard Shri P.C. Das, learned Advocate, for the appellants and Shri A.K. Chattopadhaya, learned JDR, for the Revenue. 5. The appellants had initially entered 20 kgs. of printing ink in their RG-1 record but the same was found to be defective and un....