Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI OCR

Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2000 (11) TMI 720

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....V.K. Agrawal, Member (T)]. -  The issue involved in this appeal, filed by M/s. Plaza Steel & Alloys Ltd., is whether the benefit of Notification No. 202/88-C.E., dt. 1-3-1988 is available to them in respect of the final products manufactured by them out of Waste and scrap of iron and steel. 2. When the matter was called, no one was present on behalf of the Appellants. In fact notice is....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....that the definition of waste and scrap, as per Note 6 to Section XV of the Central Excise Tariff Act, means the metal waste and scrap from the manufacture or mechanical working of metals and metal goods definitely not usuable as such because of breakage, cutting up or wear or other reasons and the Appellants were using the inputs by remelting alongwith other scrap. The appellants have mentioned in....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....was specified input in Notification No. 202/88-C.E. 4. We have considered the submissions of the ld. DR and perused the records. As the matter is quite old and the Appellants were heard by the Collector (Appeals) before deciding their appeal, we are of the view that no prejudice has been caused to the Appellants by being not heard by the Assistant Collector. It is not in dispute that the inp....