Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful)

TaxTMI AI Drafter workflow from input facts to final legal draft Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2000 (9) TMI 660

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....pondent. [Order]. -  This appeal arises from Order-in-Appeal No. 249/97(M), dated 15-10-1997 denying the Modvat credit on tyres and tubes meant for the flow cars, which are used within the factory for movement of materials. The Assistant Commissioner's impugned order held that Modvat credit is not available on the flow cars and as a result its spares tyres and tubes also will fall under....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... by Final Order No. 402/2000, dated 28-3-2000 [2001 (130) E.L.T. 752 (Tribunal)]. It is his contention that the flow cars are having same functions that of fork lift as well as Morris 1 Ton capacity geared trolley and all these three items perform the same function of material handling equipment and used within the factory, hence, in terms of these judgments, in the present case, the main item its....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ial handling equipment within the factory have been held to be eligible for Modvat credit in terms of the ratio of the judgments cited above. The impugned item in the present case namely flow car is admittedly utilised for transport of components from one place to another within the factory which is recorded in the Order-in-Original. There is no dispute with regard to flow car activity of transpor....