Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Tools

We've upgraded AI Tools on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Tools

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2000 (5) TMI 652

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....324/98 and Stay Order No. 657 to 660/98 both dated 10-7-98 while the appellants have submitted applications for rectification of mistake, Revenue has submitted Misc. application under Rule 41 of CEGAT (Procedure) Rules. 2. When the matters were called, none appears for the applicants who have submitted applications for rectification of mistake and they have requested for decision on merits. ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....that since the matter involved the clearance of these goods illegaly under Transfer of Residence Rules, therefore the Tribunal vide final order noted above ruled that absolute confiscation was not warranted and had allowed redemption on payment of fine of Rs. 85,000/- and reduced the penalties. From this, it is abandantly clear that the goods confiscated had not suffered duty and duty needs to be ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....t the goods be offered for redemption on payment of fine of Rs. 85,000/-. Penalty was also reduced as noted in the said final order. The applicants who have submitted the applications for rectification of mistake, on the other hand have contended that goods have already borne duty and therefore they would not have to pay duty any more. However, they have not produced any evidence to the effect tha....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....sp; Thereafter from the remaining amounts of the sale proceeds, the Commissioner of Customs shall appropriate the penalties imposed if the same have not been paid otherwise by these appellants, and (c)      From then remaining amounts, if any, of sales proceeds noted above, the Commissioner of Customs shall appropriate the amount of Rs. 85,000/- for redemption of the said....