Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2001 (9) TMI 400

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....pur (hereinafter referred to as applicant) imported two consignments of Gallnuts vide container no. GSTU-238558-7 and GSTU-249531-0 declaring the value @ 375 USD PMT. The importer filed Bill of Entry No. 101678 dt. 06-01-2000 through their CHA. M/s. R.B. Ramnath Lambah & Sons Pvt. Ltd. (CHA No. 11/692) for the clearance of Container No. GSTU-238558-7. The goods were assessed as declared. The goods were assessed at Rs. 2,68,889.19 and duty was paid on Gallnuts amounting to Rs. 44,367/-. Thereafter the goods were examined and customs out of charge for clearance was given. 3. In the meantime, on specific information the Officers of Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai intercepted and re-examined the aforesaid container under Panchnama on....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....il Agarwal of Shri Agarwal Trading Co., were recorded under Section 39 and 40 of FERA 1973. 7. Shri Sureshchand Agarwal, Proprietor of M/s. Agarwal Trading Co., Jaipur in his statement recorded under Section 40 of FERA 1973 on 20-1-2000 inter alia admitted that as per panchanama dt. 11-01-2000 the container no. GSTU-238558-7 contained 90 bags of Gallnuts and 267 bags of Almond Kernels, which were found instead of 357 bags of Gallnuts, declared. This container was imported from M/s. Bombay Food Stuff, Dubai, that another container had also been imported. He further stated that in winter season the demand for Almond Kernels is very much heavy. As per discussion with Shri Shaikh Salam Mohammad of M/s. Bombay Food Stuff the later sugges....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....declared the goods as 303 bags of Almond Kernel weighing 13635 kgs. and totally valued at Rs. 19,62,590/- (assessable value) and 72 bags of Gallnuts weighing 3240 kgs. totally valued at Rs. 53,811/- (assessable value) the total duty calculated was Rs. 10,11,616/-. 12. Based on the investigations conducted by the Officers of the Customs a Show Cause Notice SG/Misc-27/DC/2000/SIIB (Import) S/10-9/BSH/2000/SIIB (Import) dt. 07-07-2000 was issued to (1) Shri Agarwal Trading Co., Jaipur, (2) Shri Sureshchandra Agarwal, (3) Shri Arun Kumar Gupta of M/s. R.B. Ramnath Lambah (CHA) (4) Shri Pawan Vijan, Docks Clerk of M/s. R.B. Ramnath Lambah (CHA). 13. Prosecution against Shri Sureshchand Agarwal has already been launched under Sect....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ayable by him on account of Special Additional Duty (SAD). The Learned Advocate stated that the Applicant was willing to pay this additional amount also but prayed that the same may be adjusted from the sale proceeds realised. 20. The Learned Advocate submitted that considering the fact that they made a full and true disclosure, it is requested to grant immunity from penalty and fine. They were aware that since prosecution has already been launched by customs they would not be eligible for any immunity; however, they pray for immunity from prosecution under the FERA that may be contemplated by the Enforcement Directorate. 21. The Revenue, Commissioner of Customs (Import) Mumbai, was represented by Shri Sharad Meshram, Apprai....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....and enquired whether the applicant seeks immunity from interest? 26. The Advocate submitted that the Applicant has sought for waiver of interest in the Annexure 'D' to the application made before the Commission. 27. To a specify query raised by the Commission, whether separate proceedings have been initiated under FERA? It was pointed out by the Revenue that a Show Cause Notice has been issued by FERA dt. 29-06-2001. 28. The Commission has gone through the case records, the submissions made by the Applicant and the Revenue. The Applicant has co-operated with the Settlement Commission and has made a full and true disclosure. The Applicant has conceded at the time of hearing to the mistaken calculations of duty by the ....