Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2001 (5) TMI 418

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Shri T.D. Bodade, JDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : Gowri Shankar, Member (T)]. -  The appellant is a manufacturer of machinery. It filed a classification list for "textile dyeing plant" and "machinery for cutting photographic paper", claiming their classification under headings 8451.10 and 8439.10 respectively of the tariff. Heading 84.51 includes machinery for dyeing fabrics made ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....stt. Commissioner [whose order has been upheld by Commissioner (Appeals) confirmed the classification of the goods as parts and their consequent liability to duty. The Asstt. Commissioner confirmed the demand for duty treating them as part. Hence this appeal. 3. We have heard both sides. 4. In its decision in Flat Products India Ltd. - 2000 (115) E.L.T. 629 the Tribunal held that w....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....this matter was pending before the lower authorities and could not have been cited before them. We are of the view that the matter should be re-examined by the Asstt. Commissioner to see whether it is in fact covered by this decision. Mr. M.H. Patil undertakes to make submissions before the Asstt. Commissioner on the applicability of this decision within two months from the receipt of this order, ....