1937 (3) TMI 10
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... and continued : For the purpose of determining whether the petition should be granted or not, it is necessary for me to look at the allegations in the petition, and I do not propose to travel beyond them. The first allegation, the first grievance under which the petitioners labour, and which is made a ground for asking me to exercise the jurisdiction of the Court and to say that it is just and eq....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....I think, since there would be disputed questions of fact, and perhaps an occasion for interrogatories or discovery, an action in the ordinary way in the Chancery Division. But, at least on a petition, I am not going to exercise my jurisdiction to wind up a company on that ground, on the footing that it is for that reason just and equitable. The next allegation in the petition is that at a certa....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ith balance sheets, and, for reasons which may or may not be adequte, the directors thought fit in the year 1936 not to supply them with a balance sheet. I say no more about that, and I see no reason in that for winding up the company. In paragraph 9 a number of allegations are made relating to the salaries which the directors have received. No doubt they were masters of the situation, and they....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....tself was altogether misconceived, and that it inflicted injury on the company that the petition should remain on the file a moment longer than was necessary. In the circumstances I decided to go on with the petition and to allow, if I thought fit at a later stage, the cross-examination of the deponents. It appeared to me to be plain as the matter went on that it must be confined to the allegation....
TaxTMI