Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

1933 (5) TMI 13

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Rudra came over to Rangoon to hawk about shares belonging to the respondent company and several other companies. He induced the plaintiff to pay him a sum of Rs. 251 for the purpose of purchasing 20 shares in the respondent company. The plaintiff heard nothing about his money till the year 1929 when after threatening the respondent company to inform the Registrar of Joint Stock Companies of their....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Co. (1868) 3 Ch. A. 633. where at p. 637, Page Wood, L.J., says as follows: "The course of decisions has determined that to obtain a binding allotment there must be an application, an allotment and a communication of the allotment." In this case I must hold that there has been no communication of the allotment to the petitioner. The respondent company produced a book which they call a letter cop....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....the money for the shares had been paid up. No reply was sent to this letter and evidently the petitioner, being disgusted at the behaviour of the respondent company, wrote a letter through Mr. Chowdhury to the respondent company, which is Ex. A, asking for the return of his money with interest. In that letter it was distinctly stated that no shares had been allotted to the petitioner. No reply was....