1999 (7) TMI 421

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....a, JDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : S.L. Peeran, Member (J)]. These two appeals arise from two separate orders-in-original. As the issue is common and the appellants being same, therefore they are taken-up for disposal as per law. 2. The issue that arises for consideration in Appeal No. E/1211/92-B is as to whether the following items processed in appellants workshop are goods and w....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....998 has following the judgment of the Vindhya Paper Mills as reported in 1998 (97) E.L.T. 298 held that mere cutting angles, other shapes and sections of steel into required sizes, drilling and punching holes, painting, welding etc. for construction of godowns, stores would not amount to process of manufacture. The above order has also referred earlier order of the Tribunal in the case of SAE (Ind....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... in 1999 (107) E.L.T. 337 and concluded the same view as expressed in the earlier orders that these items would not be goods and no duty is liable except M.S. Racks which the appellants do not wish to contest. 7. Heard ld. DR, Ms. Aruna Gupta who reiterates Revenue's view. 8. On careful consideration of the submissions, we notice from the cited orders that the items except M.S. Racks a....