Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

TaxTMI AI Drafter workflow from input facts to final legal draft Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2001 (7) TMI 398

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....983-84. After the above Notification was issued, the respondents had filed Classification List declaring their product viz. bottle cooler as industrial refrigerator and claiming exemption in respect of the product under the Notification. The Classification List was approved by the proper officer of Central Excise in November 1983. But soon thereafter, the Assistant Collector issued a letter dated 24-1-1984 to the party directing them to treat the approval of the Classification List as provisional under Rule 9B and also to show cause why the product should not be treated as 'refrigerating appliance' and why the benefit of concessional rate of duty under the Notification should not be denied. The respondents contested the Department's proposa....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nces; that the bottle coolers manufactured and cleared by the respondents during the relevant period were not refrigerators inasmuch as their function was just to keep the beverages chilled and not to preserve food items for long periods without deterioration; that the party had never described their bottle coolers as refrigerators in any of their brochures; that the bottle coolers were, in fact, refrigerating appliances covered by the erstwhile Tariff Item No. 29A(1) and, therefore, the concessional rate of 50% ad valorem under the Notification was not available in respect of the goods. Ld. DR submitted that the Collector (Appeals) did not apply his mind to the distinction between 'refrigerators' and 'other refrigerating appliances' under ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....aratus provided with means for being cooled, such as domestic refrigerator; or a large container, such as storage refrigerator and service refrigerator." Counsel submitted that the respondents' bottle coolers could be considered as storage refrigerators inasmuch as they were box-shaped cabinets suitable for storing 70, 118, 221 or 280 bottles of beer. Counsel also quoted from the 1994 Ashrae Handbook on Refrigeration [by American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers, Inc.] and submitted that the bottle coolers were identical to the 'reach-in cabinets' referred to in the said handbook. The reach-in cabinets were specifically described as refrigerators in the handbook. Counsel also relied on the HSN Explanatory ....