AI Drafter - (New and Powerful) 
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter. 
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2000 (10) TMI 541
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....cates, for the Appellant. Shri B.B. Sarkar, JDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : Gowri Shankar, Member (T)]. - The question for consideration in this appeal is the eligibility to deduction from the assessable value of the goods manufactured by the appellant of various discounts. We shall discuss each of these discounts. 2. (a) Annual incentive at 7% for suiting and 4% for shirtin....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....derstood at the time of removal of the goods, though it is quantified later. Hence, the discount in the present case is also entitled to deduction. (b) "No goods return" discount of 0.5% is given to a dealer who does not return any of the goods supplied to him for any reason. This discount has also been disallowed on the ground that it is discretionary, and it is in the nature of an incent....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....that it was not known at the time of removal of the goods. The discount was provisionally allowed in 1989 on the price list filed by the appellant and therefore, could not be said not to have been known when the provisional assessment was finalised later. The reason for denial of this discount, this is not valid, and it is allowed. (e) The last is the discount of. 5% allowed to dealers who....