Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2001 (3) TMI 417

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ant. Shri D.C. Dighe, Advocate, for the Respondents. [Order per : J.H. Joglekar, Member (T)]. -  We have heard Shri B.K. Choubey for the Revenue and Shri D.C. Dighe for the Respondent. 2. The respondents when narrating the details of the amounts charged from their buyers, in the invoices issued under Rule 52A of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 indicated certain amounts as per ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....; the amount demanded i.e. Rs. 965/-. He also imposed a penalty of Rs. 1000/- on the assessees. The assessee then filed an appeal. The Commissioner (Appeals) held that the charges were incurred for transport beyond the factory and as such were not includible in the assessable value. He did not accept the arbitrary division as made by the Assistant Collector. He held that since the charges were inc....