1999 (9) TMI 549

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....r the Appellant. Mrs. Aruna Gupta, JDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : S.L. Peeran, Member (J)]. -  The appeal had been dismissed under Rule 20 of CEGAT (Procedure) Rules and the application for restoration was not accepted by the CEGAT, therefore the appellants filed a Writ Petition before the High Court of Karnataka and the Writ Petition No. 23521/97 was allowed by its Order date....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....on, they are not entitled to the benefit of the Notification. 4. Ld. Counsel contends that the issue is no longer res Integra and the Tribunal in large number of appeals have held that affixing the name of Electricity Board does not bar the appellants from seeking the benefit of the notification as the words "KEB" is not brand name or a trade name, but it refers to Karnataka Electricity Bo....