2000 (5) TMI 505
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....nts. [Order per : Archana Wadhwa, Member (J)]. - Arguing on the appeal, Shri S.K. Bagaria, learned Advocate submits that the appellants are engaged in the manufacture of ball, roller bearing which they were clearing without payment of duty in terms of Notification No. 217/85-C.E. The present dispute relates to the dutiability on cages, rings and ball which have been manufactured by them and use....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ct of these items in terms of Notification No. 217/85 by pleading that it is not only parts of I.C. Engines, but parts of parts which are also exempt under Notification No. 217/85. This plea of the appellants was not considered by the Commissioner (Appeals) on the limited ground that as the same was not taken before the original adjudicating authority, the appellate authority could not go beyond t....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....e Commissioner (Appeals) was not justified in not considering the said legal plea. 2. Countering the arguments, Shri R.K. Roy, learned J.D.R. submits that the wordings of Notification No. 217/85 are clear and grant exemption only to the parts of the internal combustion engines. The demand has been raised not on the ball bearings, but on the rings, cages and balls which have gone into manufac....