Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2000 (12) TMI 282

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Order per : S.S. Kang, Member (J)]. - The applicant filed this application under Rule 41 of the CEGAT (Procedure) Rules, 1982 for rectification of mistake in the Stay Order No. 160/2000-B dated 17th August, 2000. 2. The contention of the applicant is that the case of the applicant before the lower authorities was that they were clearing goods with the House marks of M/s. Fujitsu India Tele....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....s not maintainable. His submission is that under Rule 41 of the CEGAT (Procedure ) Rules, 1982, the Tribunal can pass orders or give directions as may be necessary in relation to pass the order or to prevent abuse of his process to secure the ends of justice. He submits that the present application does not fulfil the conditions laid down under Rule 41 of the CEGAT (Procedure) Rules, 1982. He, the....