2000 (3) TMI 514

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Shri Mewa Singh, SDR for the Respondent. [Order per : G.R. Sharma, Member (T)]. -  We have heard Shri K.S. Chauhan, ld. Counsel on the Miscellaneous Application for restoration of the Appeal which was dismissed for non-prosecution on 24-11-1999 on the ground that the notice issued to the appellant was received back with a postal remark that the 'Factory is closed'. Ld. Counsel submits t....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... the notice was not received by the Counsel of the appellant, as the papers of the Tribunal show that a copy of the notice was also sent to the Counsel. 3. We have heard the rival submissions. We find that notice sent to the appellant was received back with a postal remark 'factory closed'. If the factory was closed, it was incumbent on the appellant to intimate the change of address for c....