Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2000 (8) TMI 432

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... [Order per : G.R. Sharma, Member (T)]. - Shri Ravinder Narain, ld. Counsel submits that a mistake has crept in the Misc. Order No. 15/2000-C dt. 28-1-2000. He refers to the order and submits that it was admitted that the issues of limitation and methodology of calculation though discussed and brought to the notice of the original bench yet no order was passed by the original bench. He submits ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ore the Bench that point is considered. He submits that in this case the difference of opinion arose was that of classification. He submits that limitation and methodology of calculation of duty amount might have not been considered important by the author of the order. He, therefore, submits that there was no mistake apparent on the face of the records. 3. We have heard the rival submission....