Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2000 (8) TMI 432

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....rain, Advocate, for the Res-pondents. [Order per : G.R. Sharma, Member (T)]. - Shri Ravinder Narain, ld. Counsel submits that a mistake has crept in the Misc. Order No. 15/2000-C dt. 28-1-2000. He refers to the order and submits that it was admitted that the issues of limitation and methodology of calculation though discussed and brought to the notice of the original bench yet no order was p....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... is settled that if any point is taken before the Bench that point is considered. He submits that in this case the difference of opinion arose was that of classification. He submits that limitation and methodology of calculation of duty amount might have not been considered important by the author of the order. He, therefore, submits that there was no mistake apparent on the face of the records. ....