Just a moment...

⚠✕
❮ Top
☎ Help
🚀 New: Section-Wise Filter ✕

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws →

☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback✕

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS
PrevPreviousNextNext

2000 (8) TMI 424

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....rder per : S.L. Peeran, Member (J)]. - This stay and appeal arises from Order-in-Appeal No. 67/2000 (M-I), dated 26-5-2000 passed by Commissioner (Appeals), Chennai dismissing the appeal under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act for not complying with the interim order of stay directing the appellant to pre-deposit the amount of Rs. 3,47,312/-. 2. Revenue had initiated proceedings for re....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....eded to recover Rs. 3,47,312/-. Their application for interim stay was rejected and as they did not pre-deposit the amounts, the Commissioner after a detailed discussion rejected their appeal for non-deposit under Section 35F of the Act. 4. We have heard ld. Consultant Shri C. Chidambaram for appellants and Shri S. Kannan, ld. DR. 5. Ld. Consultant raised several pleas as pleaded in th....

PrevPreviousNextNext