TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2000 (5) TMI 411
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....houbey, JDR, for the Respondents. [Order]. - When the matter came up for hearing, the main appeal itself has been taken up for decision after waiving deposit and with the consent of both sides. 2. This is an appeal filed by the assessees who manufacture cranes and material handling equipments. They were availing of Modvat credit. They filed declarations under rule 57G. By a sho....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....-. An appeal was filed and the Commissioner (Appeals) confirmed the same. Hence the present appeal. 3. The learned counsel argued that once the declaration showed the correct description of the goods but if there is any incorrect classification in respect of inputs is there, even then credit cannot be denied. He cites the Judgment of the Tribunal in the case of Maxxon India Limited v. CCE,....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....anged the classification due to several reasons. It may be due to the department themselves changed the classification. We do not know but one thing is clear that nowhere it has been denied in the show cause notice that the input was not used in or in relation to the manufacture of final product. Moreover the judgment of the Tribunal in the case of Maxxon India Limited (supra) clearly holds in fav....