Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

1999 (10) TMI 195

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....to the process of exposure and developing for use in the manufacture of printed articles. The respondents had manufactured such exposed and developed plates and had used them captively without any declaration and without payment of any Central Excise duty. Proceedings were drawn against them under show cause notice dated 29-1-1992 and such plates were held to be classifiable under sub-heading No. 8442.00 of the Central Excise Tariff by the Asstt. Collector of Central Excise. A demand of Rs. 12,978.15 was confirmed for the period July, 1991 to December, 1991, and a penalty of Rs. 500/- was imposed. On appeal, the Collector of Central Excise (Appeals) held the plates in question classifiable under Heading No. 37.05 of the Tariff. 2. T....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ged in the manufacture of printed articles, materials and matter. Theirs was not a photographic establishment. They had no photographic laboratory. The process adopted by them was not that of photography. According to Chapter Note 2, under Chapter 37 "photographic" relates to a process which permits the formation of visible images directly or indirectly by the action of light or other forms of radiation on sensitive surfaces. Chapter 37 of the Central Excise Tariff covers photographic or cinematographic goods. Plates exposed are those that have been chemically treated to render the image visible. Plates may be negative with lights and shades reversed or positive for the duplication of further positives, or reversible for direct production o....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e relied upon in determining the classification of a product [refer Supreme Court decision in the case of Indian Tool Manufacturers v. Asstt. Collector of Central Excise, Nasik, 1994 (74) E.L.T. 12 (S.C.)]. According to HSN Heading No. 84.42 included inter alia printing type and the printing parts of printing machinery, for example, separate characters, plates, blocks and cylinders, engraved or otherwise prepared for printing, used to print texts or illustrations (by hand or by the machines of Heading 84.43): and prepared lithographic stones, cylinders, blocks and plates (i.e. those prepared so as to be suitable for engraving or otherwise receiving an image for subsequent use in printing). Offset print plates of zinc or aluminium or simi....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....mson Press (I) Ltd. v. CC, Bombay, 1996 (62) ECR 676 (Tribunal). 7. We find that the matter is covered by the Tribunal's decision in the case of Kasturi & Sons, supra. The matter was under the erstwhile Customs Tariff, but the goods imported were printing plates which were directly and exclusively used in printing. They were held to be classifiable under Heading No. 84.34 of the erstwhile Customs Tariff which during the relevant time covered the same as Heading No. 84.42 of the Central Excise Tariff. Heading No. 84.34 of the erstwhile Customs Tariff read as under :  "Machinery, apparatus and accessories for type founding or type-setting machinery other than the machine tools of Heading No. 84.45/48, for preparing or working ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....g of newspapers and news magazines. Para 5 from that decision is extracted below : "5. We find ourselves unable to agree with the learned Counsel for Revenue. Firstly, there is no material placed before us to show that the goods referred to in the Notification No. 161 are the same goods as are concerned herein. There is equally no material to show that the respondents-assessees have taken advantage of the said Notification. Coming to the question of classification. Chapter Heading 37.01/08 speaks inter alia of photographic plates and film sensitised whether or not exposed or developed. As against this Chapter Heading 84.34 (which is relied upon by the respondents-assessees) speaks of "machinery apparatus and accessories for type fou....