Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

1999 (8) TMI 281

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

...., JDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : J.H. Joglekar, Member (T)]. -  Appellants desired disposal of the appeals on merits. 2. We have heard Shri Deepak Kumar, ld. DR for the revenue. 3. The appellants manufacture medicaments. Under the related laws they were required to draw samples for quality control purposes and also for testing purposes. Some of the samples were re....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....this notification because they were cleared in normal packing. On this ground duty amounting to Rs. 7,873/- was demanded. The Collector after hearing the assessees confirmed the demand but did not choose to impose a penalty. The appeal is against this order. 4. Before the Collector the assessees had claimed that samples were packed in a form different from trade packing and that they were ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... the classification lists kept on record. The lists showed that Metacin tablets were packed for sale, in packets of 10 tablets as well as of 4 tablets. After describing the various packings, the final entry in the classification lists was "quality control samples of all above products for laboratory purposes as per drug rules." Against this entry the benefit of the cited notification was claimed. ....