Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

1999 (9) TMI 191

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....mber (T)]. -  The question for consideration in this appeal is the value of the copper dross imported by the respondent to this appeal by the Commissioner, declared of U.S. $ 1,200 per M.T. was found not to be acceptable by the Additional Commissioner for the reason that the goods were declared initially to be copper dross of 45% purity whereas the copper content of the dross found to be on ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ontain copper far in excess of this percentage - more than twice in fact. Accordingly, Additional Commissioner was correct in not accepting the transaction value. This however, does not mean that he would be correct in applying the value to this product of copper ingots. Ingots and dross are entirely a different commodities. The Additional Commissioner has erased this distinction by treating dross....